A comprehensive analysis, jointly spearheaded by Josefa A. Antón Ruiz, a distinguished researcher from the Department of Health Psychology at the University of Alicante (UA), indicates that a substantial 43.5% of individuals employed in healthcare settings experienced sleep disturbances of clinical significance during and in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. This scholarly work, disseminated within the esteemed journal Current Psychology by publisher Springer Nature, synthesizes findings from an aggregate of 34 distinct investigations, encompassing 14 nations and a participant pool of 32,930 healthcare professionals.
This meta-analytic endeavor furnishes one of the foremost and most current global estimations regarding the incidence and severity of insomnia within this critical occupational group. Its scope thoughtfully extends to encompass both the critical early phases of the pandemic and the subsequent transition back towards pre-pandemic normalcy. As articulated by Antón-Ruiz, who collaborated on this publication with fellow researchers from the Catholic University of Murcia, the aggregated data unequivocally demonstrate that the magnitude of insomnia symptoms surpassed established clinical thresholds across the diverse array of assessment methodologies employed.
The investigation further illuminates pronounced disparities contingent upon the nature of occupational exposure. Among those workforce members operating on the vanguard, directly engaging with COVID-19 patients, the reported prevalence of insomnia escalated to an alarming 54.9%. In contrast, this figure stood at a considerably lower 33.5% for personnel not directly involved in patient care roles. Such findings lend considerable weight to the prevailing hypothesis that sustained exposure to high-stakes environments, the inherent risk of contagion, elevated job demands, and the burden of critical decision-making collectively contributed to a significant decline in sleep quality, as elucidated by the doctoral researcher in health psychology.
Moreover, a discernible geographical variation in insomnia rates was also identified by this research. European regions reported a higher prevalence, registering at 58.2%, whereas Asian countries presented a rate of 38.3%.
Implications and Strategic Recommendations
The study underscores that sleep disturbances were not merely prevalent but also presented a clinically significant burden both during the pandemic’s peak and in its subsequent phases. Dr. Antón-Ruiz emphasizes that the well-documented correlation between disrupted sleep patterns and the development of other chronic mental health conditions imbues these findings with profound implications for the long-term viability and robust resilience of our healthcare infrastructures.
In summation, the outcomes derived from this research highlight the urgent necessity for the implementation of structured psychological support frameworks tailored for healthcare personnel. Additionally, it champions the establishment of targeted interventions focused on sleep regulation and effective stress management techniques. The UA researcher further posited that proactively addressing insomnia transcends individual well-being; it is an indispensable determinant of patient safety and the overall quality of care delivered. Consequently, prioritizing sleep health must be systematically integrated into institutional strategic planning and preparedness protocols for future public health emergencies.
Dr. Antón-Ruiz concluded by affirming that the availability of robust, medium-to-long-term scientific evidence is instrumental in substantiating occupational health policy decisions, providing data-driven guidance for public health initiatives, and firmly establishing that mental health – with a particular emphasis on sleep quality – is not a peripheral concern. Instead, it represents a cornerstone element in the cultivation and maintenance of secure, sustainable, and high-caliber healthcare systems.
Horyza, A., et al. (2026). Insomnia among healthcare professionals during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Current Psychology. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-026-09091-9. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-026-09091-9
