For many decades, the imposing figure of dinosaurs, particularly the formidable Tyrannosaurus rex, has profoundly fascinated both the general populace and the scientific community of paleontology. Popular culture has frequently portrayed the T. rex as a colossal and terrifying apex predator that held dominion over its prehistoric contemporaries.

However, there has been a historical divergence of opinion among paleontologists regarding the precise ecological role of this magnificent creature. Recent scientific consensus suggests that, analogous to many contemporary fauna, the T. rex was not exclusively an active hunter of other dinosaurs for sustenance but also engaged in scavenging for its dietary needs.

What constituted its dietary fare? How did a T. rex secure its prey? What were its feeding methodologies?

An examination of fossil remains unearthed from strata contemporaneous with T. rex indicates that herbivorous dinosaurs, such as the iconic Triceratops with its formidable horns, or the distinctive duck-billed Edmontosaurus, likely formed a part of the T. rex‘s nutritional intake. The unequivocal presence of T. rex bite impressions on the osseous structures of Triceratops and Edmontosaurus strongly substantiates this inference.

Nevertheless, elucidating the intricacies of predatory or feeding behaviors often presents a more formidable challenge. Such investigations frequently necessitate a degree of forensic reconstruction. In certain circumstances, fossilized trackways or bones bearing distinct bite marks can furnish relatively direct evidence of dinosaur interactions with one another and their surrounding milieu.

Despite the utility of these fossil types, definitive answers concerning the precise hunting strategies of T. rex often remain elusive. A recent scientific publication authored by paleontologist John Scannella and myself, focusing on an exceptionally well-preserved Edmontosaurus cranial element, may initiate the process of addressing this enduring question.

Illustration of a T. rex biting another dinosaur on the head, in a jungle setting
An artistic depiction of a T. rex engaging with an Edmontosaurus. The presence of a tooth embedded within an Edmontosaurus skull offers valuable insights into the dinosaur that consumed it. (Jenn Hall/Montana State University/Museum of the Rockies)

Cranial Markings Reveal Predatory Events

Housed at the Museum of the Rockies in Bozeman, Montana, lies a remarkably intact Edmontosaurus skull that provides a compelling window into the predatory and consumptive behaviors of the T. rex. This specimen was initially unearthed in 2005 within the eastern Montana region, on land administered by the federal Bureau of Land Management.

A noteworthy characteristic of this particular Edmontosaurus is the presence of a partial tooth fragment that has pierced directly through the superior aspect of the snout into the animal’s cranial cavity. Furthermore, the skull exhibits numerous defensive bite marks on both lateral surfaces.

The penetrating depth of the tooth strongly implies a forceful application of bite pressure to the victim’s facial region. The absence of any discernible regenerative bone tissue around the impaled tooth suggests that it was lodged post-mortem or, conceivably, very shortly prior to the animal’s demise.

Tomographic scans have precisely delineated the tooth’s orientation within the Edmontosaurus skull. Based on its trajectory, it appears the tooth fractured and became embedded during a direct confrontation between the Edmontosaurus and its assailant.

In extant animal populations, such encounters typically culminate in the fatal injury of the bitten individual. When this observation is compounded by the lack of healing indicators and the considerable force required to embed a tooth into osseous tissue, it strongly suggests that the Edmontosaurus likely did not survive this predatory engagement.

Identity of the Attacker

Ascertaining the identity of carnivores solely from bite impressions can be exceedingly challenging, as these marks frequently lack the specificity required for definitive identification. This inherent difficulty often hinders bite mark analyses in pinpointing a particular predatory species. However, the dental morphology of carnivorous dinosaurs is frequently more diagnostic, with certain tooth structures being uniquely characteristic of specific species.

A comparative analysis of the serration patterns and the overall dimensions of the embedded tooth against the dentition of all carnivorous dinosaurs cohabiting with the Edmontosaurus leads to the unequivocal conclusion that a Tyrannosaurus species was responsible for the attack.

What was the scale of this Tyrannosaurus? This query was addressed by correlating the size of the serrations on the embedded tooth with those observed on intact teeth recovered from the cranial regions of various unearthed Tyrannosaurus specimens. Our investigation revealed that the tooth originated from an adult Tyrannosaurus, possessing a cranial structure approximately one meter in length.

Implications of the Bite Marks

The presence of bite marks on the skull strongly indicates that the Edmontosaurus was not merely dispatched by the Tyrannosaurus, but was subsequently consumed.

The spatial distribution of these bite marks offers insights into the feeding strategies of the predator. On the Edmontosaurus skull, the impressions are concentrated on the right lateral aspect, posterior to the orbital socket, while on the left side, they are situated along the posterior third of the mandibular region.

In hadrosaurid species such as the Edmontosaurus, the posterior portion of the skull housed the principal masticatory musculature, representing the area with the most substantial muscle mass following the consumption of softer tissues from the body.

Modern predatory animals typically target the most flesh-rich sections of a carcass, such as the limbs and viscera, progressively moving towards areas with less muscular tissue, like the cranium and extremities.

Given that the Edmontosaurus specimen is represented solely by its skull, this suggests that the Tyrannosaurus had meticulously stripped most of the musculature from the carcass before portions of it were dispersed by environmental factors and subsequently buried.

The acquisition of direct fossil evidence indicating that a dinosaur was likely killed and consumed, and the subsequent identification of the predator as a Tyrannosaurus, represents an exceptionally rare discovery. Such a fossil provides an invaluable perspective on the potential hunting and feeding behaviors of large theropod dinosaurs.

The Conversation